Cooper et al v. Citifinancial Services et al (MAG+)

Filing 18

ORDERED that: 1) The 16 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2) Plfs' 17 Objection is OVERRULED; and 3) Plfs' claims are DISMISSED prior to service of process, pursuant to 28 USC § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and (iii). Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 6/14/2011. (wcl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION WILLIAM B. COOPER and RENATA S. COOPER, Plaintiffs, v. CITIFINANCIAL SERVICES, et al. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:11-CV-177-WKW ) ) ) ) ORDER On May 26, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 16) in this case. Plaintiffs filed an Objection (Doc. # 17) on June 10, 2011. The Objection is untimely, and it recounts a lengthy narrative on the civil rights era as seen from Plaintiff William Cooper’s perspective, an interesting memoir, but entirely unrelated to this cause of action. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 16) is ADOPTED; 2. Plaintiffs’ Objection (Doc. # 17) is OVERRULED; and 3. Plaintiffs’ claims are DISMISSED prior to service of process, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and (iii). DONE this 14th day of June, 2011. /s/ W. Keith Watkins CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?