Bailey v. Patterson, et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 27

ORDER OVERRULING petitioner's 25 Objection ; adopting 22 report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge; this petition for habeas corpus relief is DENIED; further ORDERING that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 10/17/14. (djy, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION JAMES WILLIAM BAILEY, IV, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner, vs. TONY PATTERSON, et al., Respondents. CASE NO. 1:11-cv-321-WHA ORDER This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #22), entered on September 11, 2014, and the Petitioner’s Objection thereto (Doc. #25). Following an independent evaluation and de novo review of the entire file in this case, the court finds the objection to be without merit. The Petitioner merely objects with conclusory statements to the Magistrate Judge’s determination in various paragraphs in the Recommendation. The court finds all of these objections to have been appropriately considered in the Recommendation, and the court agrees with the conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner’s objection is OVERRULED, the court ADOPTS the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and this petition for habeas corpus relief is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. DONE this 17th day of October, 2014. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?