McDowell v. Ham et al (INMATE2)

Filing 9

ORDER that the Recommendation 7 of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice and prior to service of process pursuant to the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 8/17/2011. (jg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION OSCAR PRENTICE MCDOWELL, #192 543 Plaintiff, * * v. * CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-543-MEF (WO) * EDWARD HAM - HAM PEANUT CO., et al., * Defendants. ORDER The Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. #7) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. After a review of the Recommendation, and after an independent review of the entire record, the Court believes that the Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation (Doc. #7) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice and prior to service of process pursuant to the directives of 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). th DONE this the 17 day of August, 2011. /s/ Mark E. Fuller UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?