Robinson v. Hughes, et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 70

ORDER directing that, upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is theORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: (1) The 69 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; (2) The plaintiff's 68 motion to dismiss is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 12/4/13. (scn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION JAMES L. ROBINSON, #121865, Plaintiff, v. ANDY HUGHES, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:11-cv-681-MEF ORDER On November 7, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. #69) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2. The plaintiff's motion to dismiss is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. DONE this the 4th day of December, 2013. /s/ Mark E. Fuller UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?