Barkley v. City of Dothan et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 7

ORDER as follows: 1. That the 5 Recommendation be and is hereby ADOPTED. 2. That the plaintiff's claims against the Dothan City Jail be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (i). 3. That the Dothan City Jail be and is hereby DISMISSED as a defendant in this cause of action. 4. That this case, with respect to the plaintiff's claims against the remaining defendants regarding the conditions at the Dothan City Jail, be and is hereby REFERRED BACK to the Magistrate Judge for appropriate proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 10/17/2011. (jg, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
ANDREW KEITH BARKLEY,
Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF DOTHAN, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11cv737-TMH
(WO)

ORDER
On September 13, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to
which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this case
and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is
ORDERED as follows:
1.

That the Recommendation be and is hereby ADOPTED.

2.

That the plaintiff’s claims against the Dothan City Jail be and are hereby

DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).
3.

That the Dothan City Jail be and is hereby DISMISSED as a defendant in this cause

of action.
4.

That this case, with respect to the plaintiff’s claims against the remaining

defendants regarding the conditions at the Dothan City Jail , be and is hereby REFERRED BACK
to the Magistrate Judge for appropriate proceedings.
Done this the 17th day of October 2011.
/s/ Truman M. Hobbs
________________________________________
TRUMAN M. HOBBS
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE