Jones v. Judah et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 6

ORDER adopting the 4 Recommendation; dismissing the case with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) on the claims against the defendants; dismissing without prejudice pursuant to the p rovisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) to the extent the complaint presents claims which challenge the constitutionality of a 2009 conviction and sentence imposed upon the plaintiff by the Circuit Court of Houston County, Alabama, as such claims are not properly before the court at this time. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 11/17/2011. (br, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION TORY L. JONES, AIS # 264248, Plaintiff, v. VALERIE D. JUDAH, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:11-cv-798-TMH [wo] OPINION and ORDER On October 11, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. No. 4). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, and that this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) on the claims against the defendants, and DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) to the extent the complaint presents claims which challenge the constitutionality of a 2009 conviction and sentence imposed upon the plaintiff by the Circuit Court of Houston County, Alabama, as such claims are not properly before the court at this time. DONE this 17th day of November, 2011. /s/ Truman M. Hobbs _____________________________________ TRUMAN M. HOBBS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?