Eatmon v. Pilgrim Pride Chicken Plant et al(INMATE 2)
Filing
42
OPINION and ORDER re 29 Recommendation. It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2. The Plaintiff's complaint against Defendants Pilgrim's Pride Chicken Plant and Mr. John be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); 3. Defendants Pilgrims Pride Chicken Plant and Mr. John be and are hereby DISMISSED as parties to the complaint; and 4. This case with respect to the remaining defendants be and is hereby REFERRED BACK to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 4/17/2012. (dmn, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
JAMIE EATMON, AIS #140565,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
PILGRIM’S PRIDE CHICKEN
PLANT, et al.,
Defendants.
CIV. ACT. NO. 1:11cv1002-TMH
(WO)
OPINION and ORDER
On March 20, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to
which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 29). Upon an independent review of
the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge,
it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows that:
1.
The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED;
2.
The Plaintiff’s complaint against Defendants Pilgrim’s Pride Chicken Plant and
Mr. John be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process in
accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i);
3.
Defendants Pilgrim’s Pride Chicken Plant and Mr. John be and are hereby
DISMISSED as parties to the complaint; and
4.
This case with respect to the remaining defendants be and is hereby
REFERRED BACK to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.
Done this the 17th day of April 2012.
/s/ Truman M. Hobbs
TRUMAN M. HOBBS
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?