Williams et al v. Valeska et al (MAG+)
ORDER that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 7 is ADOPTED; 2. Plaintiff's Motion to Request Addendum to Objections 10 is GRANTED; 3. Plaintiff's Objections 8 - 10 are OVERRULED; and, 4. Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(iii). Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 5/10/2012. (jg, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
MARLA ANTOINETTE WILLIAMS,
DOUGLAS ALBERT VALESKA, et al.,
CASE NO. 1:11-CV-1067-MEF
On March 12, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 7) in this
case. Despite Plaintiff filing of untimely objections (Docs. # 8-10), the Court has considered
them along with the rest of the file in this case. After an independent review of the file in
this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is
The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 7) is ADOPTED;
Plaintiff’s Motion to Request Addendum to Objections (Doc. # 10) is
Plaintiff’s Objections (Docs. # 8-10) are OVERRULED; and,
Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
DONE this the 10 day of May, 2012.
/s/ Mark E. Fuller
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?