Williams et al v. Valeska et al (MAG+)

Filing 11

ORDER that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 7 is ADOPTED; 2. Plaintiff's Motion to Request Addendum to Objections 10 is GRANTED; 3. Plaintiff's Objections 8 - 10 are OVERRULED; and, 4. Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(iii). Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 5/10/2012. (jg, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
MARLA ANTOINETTE WILLIAMS,
et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
DOUGLAS ALBERT VALESKA, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 1:11-CV-1067-MEF

ORDER
On March 12, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 7) in this
case. Despite Plaintiff filing of untimely objections (Docs. # 8-10), the Court has considered
them along with the rest of the file in this case. After an independent review of the file in
this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is
ORDERED that:
1.

The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 7) is ADOPTED;

2.

Plaintiff’s Motion to Request Addendum to Objections (Doc. # 10) is
GRANTED;

3.

Plaintiff’s Objections (Docs. # 8-10) are OVERRULED; and,

4.

Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(iii).
th

DONE this the 10 day of May, 2012.
/s/ Mark E. Fuller
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE