Forsythe v. Lt. Kirsey et al (INMATE 1)
Filing
15
ORDER that 1. The Recommendation 9 of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2. Plaintiff's claims against the Houston County Jail are dismissed with prejudice in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i);3. The Houston Cou nty Jail is dismissed as a defendant in this cause of action; and 4. This case, with respect to Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Kirsey and Buckman, is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for appropriate proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 2/28/2012. (jg, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
GREGORY FORSYTHE,
Plaintiff,
v.
HOUSTON COUNTY JAIL, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12-CV-33-TMH
ORDER
The Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. #9) in this case to which no
timely objections have been filed. After a review of the Recommendation, and after an
independent review of the entire record, the court finds that the Recommendation should be
adopted. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that
1. The Recommendation (Doc. #9) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED;
2. Plaintiff’s claims against the Houston County Jail are dismissed with prejudice in
accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i);
3. The Houston County Jail is dismissed as a defendant in this cause of action; and
4. This case, with respect to Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Kirsey and
Buckman, is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for appropriate proceedings.
Done this 28 th day of February, 2012.
/s/ Truman M. Hobbs
_______________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?