Smedley v. State of Alabama(MAG+)
ORDER that plaintiff's 9 and 10 objections are overruled; that 8 recommendation is adopted; that this action is DISMISSED prior to service of process pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), as plaintiff's claims against the State of Alabama are barred by the Eleventh Amendment. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 5/29/2012. (cc, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
STATE OF ALABAMA,
CASE NO. 1:12-cv-0312-MEF
After an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE
of the court that:
1. The plaintiff's objections (Docs. #9 & #10) to the Recommendation of the
Magistrate Judge—filed on May 21 and 22, 2012, respectively—are overruled;
2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #8) entered on May 14, 2012
3. That this action is DISMISSED prior to service of process pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B), as plaintiff's claims against the State of Alabama are barred by the Eleventh
DONE this the 29 day of May, 2012.
/s/ Mark E. Fuller
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?