Bonds v. Davenport et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 25

OPINION AND ORDER: It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 24 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, that the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be and is hereby DENIED, and that this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 6/5/2014. (dmn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION JAMES WILLIS BONDS, AIS # 215403, Petitioner, v. WARDEN DAVENPORT, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12cv376-WHA (WO) OPINION and ORDER On May 16, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case recommending that the petition of habeas corpus relief filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be dismissed in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). (Doc. # 24). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, that the petition for habeas corpus relief be and is hereby DENIED, and that this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). Done this 5th day of June, 2014. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?