Wonders v. Crutchfield et al (MAG+)
ORDERED that: (1) Mr. Wonders' 50 Objection is OVERRULED; (2) the 49 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; (3) Dfts' 42 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; (4) Mr. Wonders's 50 Motion to Amend the Second Amended Complaint is DENIED; and (5) this action is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 6/4/2013. (wcl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
MARK GERAGHTY WONDERS,
ANTHONY CRUTCHFIELD, Major
General, and JAMES MUSKOPF, Colonel, )
CASE NO. 1:12-CV-514-WKW
On May 13, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 49)
that Mr. Plaintiff Mark Geraghty Wonders’s Second Amended Complaint be
dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Mr. Wonders filed an objection
(Doc. # 50) and included in that objection a motion to amend his complaint.
Defendants filed a response in opposition to Mr. Wonders’s filing. (Doc. # 51.)
Having independently reviewed the file in this case and conducted a de novo
review of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, see 28
U.S.C. § 636(b), the court finds that the objection lacks merit for the reasons set forth
in the Recommendation and that subject matter jurisdiction is lacking. The court adds
that even if a basis for supplemental jurisdiction existed, the court would decline to
exercise such jurisdiction in this case. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). Furthermore, the
court finds that Mr. Wonders’s motion to amend the second amended complaint is
due to be denied on grounds of futility.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that
Mr. Wonders’ objection (Doc. # 50) is OVERRULED;
the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 49) is ADOPTED;
Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. # 42) is GRANTED;
Mr. Wonders’s motion to amend the second amended complaint (Doc.
# 50) is DENIED; and
this action is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
DONE this 4th day of June, 2013.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?