Richardson Dozier v. Vickers et al
ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: 1) Plf's 6 Objection to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judg is OVERRULED; 2) The 5 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; and, 3) This case is DISMISSED prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 USC § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 9/12/2012. (wcl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
MARY LOUISE RICHARDSON DOZIER, )
CHERLENE VICKERS, et al.,
CASE NO. 1:12-cv-0518-MEF
The Magistrate Judge has entered a Recommendation (Doc. # 5) that this case be
dismissed prior to service of process, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Plaintiff has
filed an Objection (Doc. # 6) to the Recommendation. After an independent review of the
file in the case, including de novo review of the portions of the Recommendation to which
Plaintiff has objected, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that:
1. Plaintiff's Objection (Doc. # 6) to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge,
filed on September 4, 2012, is OVERRULED;
2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 5), entered on August 29,
2012, is ADOPTED; and,
3. This case is DISMISSED prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).
An appropriate final judgment will be entered.
DONE this 12th day of September, 2012.
/s/ Mark E. Fuller
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?