Hawthorne v. Thomas et al (INMATE 3)

Filing 19

ORDER as follows: 1. Petitioner's 18 Objections are OVERRULED. 2. The Court ADOPTS the 17 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. 3. This 1 Petition for Habeas Corpus Relief is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 2/11/2015. (dmn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FORTHE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER HAWTHORNE, #247177,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Petitioner,
vs.
KIM TOBIAS THOMAS, et al.,
Respondents.

CASE NO. 1:12-cv-901-WHA
(WO)

ORDER
This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #17),
entered on January 26, 2015, and the Petitioner’s Objections (Doc. #18), filed on February 4,
2015.
The court has conducted an independent evaluation and de novo review of the file in this
case. Having done so, the court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s determination that this
petition is time-barred, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. Petitioner’s Objections are OVERRULED.
2. The court ADOPTS the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
3. This petition for habeas corpus relief is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED with
prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d).
Final Judgment will be entered in accordance with this order.
DONE this 11th day of February, 2015.

/s/ W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE