Johnson v. Hetzel, et al (INMATE 2)
ORDER directing that, after a review of the 8 Recommendation, and after an independent review of the entire record, it is ORDERED that: (1) The 8 Supplemental Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; (2) The 4 Recommendation of the M agistrate Judge dismissing Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief as successive in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A) is ADOPTED; and (3) Plaintiff's 6 objection thereto is overruled. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 2/28/13. (scn, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
DAVID LAMAR JOHNSON,
) CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:12-CV-1030-TMH
STATE OF ALABAMA, et al.,
The Magistrate Judge entered a Supplemental Recommendation (Doc. 8) in this case
to which no timely objections have been filed. After a review of the Recommendation, and
after an independent review of the entire record, the court finds that the Recommendation
should be adopted. Accordingly, it is
The Supplemental Recommendation (Doc. 8) of the Magistrate Judge is
The December 5, 2012 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge dismissing
Petitioner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief as successive
in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A) (Doc. No. 4)
is ADOPTED; and
Plaintiff’s objection thereto (Doc. No. 6) is overruled.
A separate judgment shall issue.
Done this 28th day of February, 2013.
/s/ Truman M. Hobbs
TRUMAN M. HOBBS
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?