McBride v. Houston County Health Care Authority et al

Filing 406

JUDGMENT in accordance with the 401 opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit entered on September 30, 2016, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that: (1) def Mamie McCory's 126 MOTION for Summ ary Judgment is granted as to plf Counrtney McBride's claims against def McCory in counts II and II of the 70 amended complaint for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs; (2) judgment is entered for def McCory and against plf McBrid e on counts II and III of the amended complaint; (3) plf McBride's state-law claim against def McCory for negligence remains pending; def McCory is not terminated as a party. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 11/28/16. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION COURTNEY McBRIDE, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. MAMIE McCORY, STEPHANIE JOHNSON, and CITY OF DOTHAN, Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12cv1047-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit entered on September 30, 2016 (doc. no. 401), it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that: (1) judgment Defendant (doc. Mamie no. 126) McCory’s is motion granted as for to summary plaintiff Courtney McBride’s claims against defendant McCory in counts II and III of the amended complaint (doc. no. 70) for needs. deliberate indifference to serious medical (2) Judgment is entered for defendant McCory and against plaintiff McBride on counts II and III of the amended complaint. (3) Plaintiff defendant McCory McBride’s for state-law negligence claim remains against pending. Defendant McCory is not terminated as a party. DONE, this the 28th day of November, 2016. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?