Contreras v. Rowe et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 10

OPINION and ORDER that the 4 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, and that this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)(2)(B)(i) for Plaintiff's failure to file the complaint within the applicable period of limitations. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 3/6/2013. (jg, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
JOSE A. HERNANDEZ CONTRERAS,
Plaintiff,
v.
CARL ROWE, et al,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 1:12-cv-1103-TMH
[wo]

OPINION and ORDER
On January 10, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case
dismissing this case with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the directives of
28 U.S.C.§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) as the complaint is not filed within the time prescribed by the
applicable period of limitations. (Doc. 4). No timely objections have been filed. Upon
an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the
Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge
be and is hereby ADOPTED, and that this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with
prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)(2)(B)(i) for Plaintiff’s failure to file the
complaint within the applicable period of limitations.
Done this the 6th day of March, 2013.

/s/ Truman M. Hobbs
TRUMAN M. HOBBS
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE