McCarter v. Sconyers, et al (INMATE 3)
ORDERED as follows: 1) Petitioner's 13 objection is OVERRULED; 2) The 12 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 3) This petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 USC § 2254 is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 10/8/2015. (wcl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FORTHE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
JEFFERY McCARTER, #176854,
KENNETH SCONYERS, et al.,
CASE NO. 1:13-cv-500-WHA
This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #12),
entered on September 11, 2015, and the Petitioner’s Objection (Doc. #13), filed on September
The court has conducted an independent evaluation and de novo review of the file in this
case and, after doing so, finds the objection to be without merit.
In his objection, the Petitioner merely restates the arguments made in his petition. Those
arguments were thoroughly discussed and rejected in the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation
and the Petitioner’s objection presents nothing which undermines the findings and conclusions of
the Magistrate Judge. The court agrees with the reasoning and conclusions contained in the
Recommendation, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. Petitioner’s objection is OVERRULED.
2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.
3. This petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED, and this
case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
DONE this 8th day of October, 2015.
/s/ W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?