Ardis v. Hughes, et al. (MAG+)

Filing 38

ORDER: It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: 1. The 36 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2. Defendant Douglas Valeska's Motion to Dismiss, as amended, filed 11/22/2013 (Doc. 12 & 14 ) and Defendant Andy Hughes' 22 Motion for Summary Judgment filed 12/18/2013 are GRANTED, and that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. 3. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 9/9/2014. (dmn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
OSCAR ARDIS,
Plaintiff,
v.
ANDY HUGHES, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 1:13-cv-786-WKW
WO

ORDER
On August 8, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. #36) in this
case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file
in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the
ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that:
1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.
2. Defendant Douglas Valeska's Motion to Dismiss, as amended, filed November 22,
2013 (Doc. #12 & #14) and Defendant Andy Hughes' Motion for Summary Judgment filed
December 18, 2013 (Doc. #22) are GRANTED, and that this action is DISMISSED with
prejudice.
3. All pending motions are DENIED as moot.
DONE this the 9th day of September, 2014.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE