Graham v. Jones et al (INMATE 3)

Filing 23

ORDER that the 20 Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 USC § 2254 is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 4/21/2016. (wcl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION TEQUAN SABRÉ GRAHAM, # 256057, Petitioner, vs. KARLA JONES, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:13-cv-882-WHA (WO) ORDER On March 23, 2016, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation that this petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied and the case dismissed with prejudice. The Petitioner was given until April 6, 2016, to file any objection to the Recommendation. On March 30, 2016, the Petitioner filed a Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice (Doc. #21), which specifically stated “Graham will not file a Reply or Objections to the Magistrate Recommendation.” The Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice was denied in an order entered by this court on April 5, 2016 (Doc. #22). No objection having been filed to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. DONE this 21st day of April, 2016. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?