Macon v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 3)

Filing 19

ORDER ADOPTING 18 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and it is hereby ORDERED that this habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED. Thiscase is DISMISSED with prejudice because the petition was not filed within the one-year grace period running from enactment of the AEDPA and is time-barred under the limitation period in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). Final Judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 2/25/2016. (dmn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION REGINALD RENARD MACON, #175196, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner, vs. STATE OF ALABAMA, et al., Respondents. CASE NO. 1:13cv-906-WHA (WO) ORDER This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #18), entered on February 2, 2016. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that this habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice because the petition was not filed within the one-year “grace period” running from enactment of the AEDPA and is time-barred under the limitation period in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). Final Judgment will be entered accordingly. DONE this 25th day of February, 2016. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?