Williams v. Billups et al (INMATE 3)

Filing 15

ORDERING as follows: (1) petitioner's 14 objections are OVERRULED; (2) ADOPTING 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge; (3) this petition for writ of heabeas corpus under 28 USC 2254 is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 5/24/16. (djy, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FORTHE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION

JONATHAN WILLIAMS, #279734,
Petitioner,
vs.
PHYLLIS BILLUPS, et al.,
Respondents.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 1:13-cv-929-WHA
(WO)

ORDER
This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #11),
entered on March 30, 2016, and the Petitioner’s Objections (Doc. #14), filed on May 5, 2016.
The court has conducted an independent evaluation and de novo review of the file in this
case, and having done so, finds that the objections are without merit. The objections simply reargue the points raised before the Magistrate Judge and present nothing that undermines the
findings in the Recommendation. This court agrees with the findings and Recommendation of
the Magistrate Judge, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. Petitioner’s objections are OVERRULED.
2. The court ADOPTS the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
3. This petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED, and this
case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
DONE this 24th day of May, 2016.

/s/ W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE