Williams v. Billups et al (INMATE 3)

Filing 15

ORDERING as follows: (1) petitioner's 14 objections are OVERRULED; (2) ADOPTING 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge; (3) this petition for writ of heabeas corpus under 28 USC 2254 is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 5/24/16. (djy, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION JONATHAN WILLIAMS, #279734, Petitioner, vs. PHYLLIS BILLUPS, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:13-cv-929-WHA (WO) ORDER This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #11), entered on March 30, 2016, and the Petitioner’s Objections (Doc. #14), filed on May 5, 2016. The court has conducted an independent evaluation and de novo review of the file in this case, and having done so, finds that the objections are without merit. The objections simply reargue the points raised before the Magistrate Judge and present nothing that undermines the findings in the Recommendation. This court agrees with the findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Petitioner’s objections are OVERRULED. 2. The court ADOPTS the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. 3. This petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. DONE this 24th day of May, 2016. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?