Williams v. Billups et al (INMATE 3)

Filing 20

ORDER directing as follows: (1) the petitioner's 14 objections and 17 amended objections are OVERRULED; (2) ADOPTING 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and 19 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge; (3) the petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 USC 2254 is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 8/3/16. (djy, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION

JONATHAN WILLIAMS, #279734,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Petitioner,
vs.
PHYLLIS BILLUPS, et al.,
Respondents.

CASE NO 1:13-cv-929-WHA
(WO)

ORDER
This case is before the court on the Supplemental Recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge (Doc. #19), entered on July 12, 2016. There being no timely objection filed to the
Supplemental Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Supplemental
Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. The Petitioner’s objections (Doc. #14) and amended objections (Doc. #17) are
OVERRULED.
2. The court ADOPTS the Recommendation (Doc. #11) and Supplemental
Recommendation (Doc. #19) of the Magistrate Judge.
3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED, and this
case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
DONE this 3rd day of August, 2016.

/s/
W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE