Thomas v. Vanreal et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 23

ORDER that: 1. The 22 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to the directives of 42 U.S.C. 1997e(a) for Plaintiffs failure to properly exhaust an administrative remedy previously availab le to him at the Houston County Jail prior to initiating this cause of action. 3. No costs be taxed herein. Final Judgment will be separately entered in accordance with this order. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 11/28/2016. (dmn, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION LAFELIX RASHUN SNELL THOMAS, AIS #282035, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER VANREAL, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:14-CV-63-WHA (wo) ORDER This cause is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge entered on October 18, 2016 (Doc. #22). There being no timely objection to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to the directives of 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) for Plaintiff’s failure to properly exhaust an administrative remedy previously available to him at the Houston County Jail prior to initiating this cause of action. 3. No costs be taxed herein. Final Judgment will be separately entered in accordance with this order. DONE this 28th day of November, 2016. /s/ W. Harold Albritton SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?