Smith, et al. v. Triad of Alabama LLC

Filing 24

ORDER directing that Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint (Doc. # 23 ) is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs shall file the amended complaint attached as Exhibit A to Doc. # 23 on or before October 3, 2014; further ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 17 ) is DENIED with leave to refile following the filing of Plaintiffs' amended complaint. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 9/26/14. (scn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION BRADLEY S. SMITH, et al., Plaintiffs, v. TRIAD OF ALABAMA, LLC, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:14-cv-324-WKW (WO - Do Not Publish) ORDER Now before the court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #17) and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint (Doc. #23). Having fully considered these motions, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint (Doc. #23) is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs shall file the amended complaint attached as Exhibit A to Doc. #23 on or before October 3, 2014. It is further ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #17) is DENIED with leave to refile following the filing of Plaintiffs’ amended complaint. Any motion to dismiss filed in response to Plaintiffs’ amended complaint, and any response in opposition thereto, shall fully set forth any arguments in support of or in opposition to such motion, and shall not simply renew or incorporate arguments made in previous motions and responses thereto. DONE this the 26th day of September, 2014. /s/ W. Keith Watkins CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?