Smith, et al. v. Triad of Alabama LLC
Filing
24
ORDER directing that Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint (Doc. # 23 ) is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs shall file the amended complaint attached as Exhibit A to Doc. # 23 on or before October 3, 2014; further ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 17 ) is DENIED with leave to refile following the filing of Plaintiffs' amended complaint. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 9/26/14. (scn, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
BRADLEY S. SMITH, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
TRIAD OF ALABAMA, LLC,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 1:14-cv-324-WKW
(WO - Do Not Publish)
ORDER
Now before the court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #17) and Plaintiffs’
Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint (Doc. #23). Having fully considered these
motions, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Amended
Complaint (Doc. #23) is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs shall file the amended complaint attached
as Exhibit A to Doc. #23 on or before October 3, 2014. It is further ORDERED that
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #17) is DENIED with leave to refile following the
filing of Plaintiffs’ amended complaint. Any motion to dismiss filed in response to
Plaintiffs’ amended complaint, and any response in opposition thereto, shall fully set forth
any arguments in support of or in opposition to such motion, and shall not simply renew or
incorporate arguments made in previous motions and responses thereto.
DONE this the 26th day of September, 2014.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?