Whitehead v. Boyd, et al. (INMATE 3)

Filing 26

JUDGMENT: In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The petitioner's objections (doc. no. 22 ) as to claims in the current petition (doc. no. 1 ) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (doc. no. 17 ) is adopted to the extent that the claims in the current petition will be denied. (3) The claims in the petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. no. 1 ) are denied. (4) The motion to amend the petition (doc. nos. 22 & 23 ) is referred back to the United States Magistrate Judge for consideration. This case is not closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 2/24/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(kh, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

TODD JOHNATHAN WHITEHEAD,
Petitioner,
v.
LOUIS BOYD, et al.,
Respondents.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:14cv329-MHT
(WO)

JUDGMENT
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court as follows:
(1) The petitioner's objections (doc. no. 22) as to
claims

in

the

current

petition

(doc.

no.

1)

are

overruled.
(2) The

United

States

Magistrate

Judge's

recommendation (doc. no. 17) is adopted to the extent
that the claims in the current petition will be denied.
(3) The claims in the petition for writ of habeas
corpus (doc. no. 1) are denied.

(4)

The motion to amend the petition (doc. nos. 22

& 23) is referred back to the United States Magistrate
Judge for consideration.
This case is not closed.
DONE, this the 24th day of February, 2017.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE