Gray v. City of Dothan
ORDER directing as follows: (1) denying def's 50 Motion to Strike; (2) however, to the extent the def is merely objecting to the admissibility of evidence, the plf is allowed until 6/5/2015 to respond, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 5/26/15. (djy, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION
IVAN KEITH GRAY,
CITY OF DOTHAN,
CIVIL ACTION NO.
It is ORDERED as follows:
(1) The defendant’s motion to strike (doc. no. 50)
(2) However, to the extent the defendant is merely
plaintiff is allowed until June 5, 2015, to respond.
In resolving the pending summary-judgment motion,
See Norman v. Southern Guar. Ins. Co., 191
F. Supp. 2d 1321, 1328 (M.D. Ala. 2002); Anderson v.
Radisson Hotel Corp., 834 F. Supp. 1364, 1368 n. 1
evidence, as required by the summary-judgment standard,
degenerate into a battle of motions to strike.
entertain briefs on the admissibility of evidence.
DONE, this the 26th day of May, 2015.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?