Progressive Direct Insurance Company v. Mathis et al
Filing
13
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING plf's 9 MOTION for Default Judgment with leave to renew, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 11/6/14. (djy, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION
PROGRESSIVE DIRECT
INSURANCE COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
v.
JUANITA MATHIS and
CHRISTOPHER L. HENDERSON,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
1:14cv712-MHT
(WO)
OPINION AND ORDER
This lawsuit is now before the court on plaintiff
Progressive
default
Because
Direct
judgment
the
requirements
against
motion
of
Insurance
the
Company’s
defendant
does
not
Juanita
comply
Servicemembers
motion
Civil
for
Mathis.
with
the
Relief
Act
(“SCRA”), 50 App. U.S.C. § 521, the court will deny the
motion, albeit with leave to renew.
Section 521 of the SCRA provides:
"In any action or proceeding covered by this
section, the court, before entering judgment
for the plaintiff, shall require the plaintiff
to file with the court an affidavit--
(A) stating whether or not the defendant is in
military service and showing necessary facts to
support the affidavit; or
(B) if the plaintiff is unable to determine
whether or not the defendant is in military
service, stating that the plaintiff is unable
to determine whether or not the defendant is in
military service."
50 App. U.S.C. § 521 (b)(1).
An
affidavit,
in
the
sense
of
a
notarized
statement, is not strictly necessary under the terms of
the SCRA.
affidavit
See Black’s Law Dictionary, 8th ed. (an
is
“[a]
voluntary
declaration
of
facts
written down and sworn to by the declarant before an
officer
authorized
notary public”).
requirement
by
verification,
or
to
administer
oaths,
such
as
a
A litigant may satisfy the affidavit
filing
"a
statement,
certificate,
in
declaration,
writing,
subscribed
and certified or declared to be true under penalty of
perjury."
50 App. U.S.C. § 521 (b)(4).
Progressive Direct has failed to meet the SCRA’s
requirements in two respects.
Direct
avers
that,
"[u]pon
2
First, while Progressive
information
and
belief,"
Mathis is not a member of the United States military,
the insurance company has not made any "showing [of]
necessary facts to support" this claim.
Second, the
insurance company has not provided an affidavit or a
"statement,
declaration,
verification,
or
certificate
... subscribed and certified or declared to be true
under
penalty
of
perjury."
Instead,
the
insurance
company merely states in its unverified motion that it
does not believe Mathis to be a member of the armed
forces.
And while the insurance company submitted an
affidavit in support of the motion, it does not touch
on the military service issue.
***
Accordingly,
Progressive
Direct
it
is
ORDERED
Insurance
that
Company’s
plaintiff
motion
for
default judgment (doc. no. 9) is denied with leave to
renew.
DONE, this the 6th day of November, 2014.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?