ASD Specialty Healthcare, Inc. v. Integrated Community Oncology Network, LLC et al
Filing
6
OPINION AND ORDER: It is therefore the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that the removing defendant has until October 21, 2014, to amend the notice of removal to allege jurisdiction sufficiently, see 28 U.S.C. § 1653; otherwise this lawsuit shall be remanded to state court. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 10/7/2014. (dmn, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION
ASD SPECIALTY
HEALTHCARE, INC., d/b/a
ONCOLOGY SUPPLY,
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
INTEGRATED COMMUNITY
)
ONCOLOGY NETWORK, L.L.C., )
and THOMAS A. MARSLAND, )
M.D.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
1:14cv976-MHT
(WO)
OPINION AND ORDER
The
allegations
insufficient
to
jurisdiction
under
of
the
notice
invoke
28
this
U.S.C.
§§
citizenship) and 1441 (removal).
of
removal
court's
1332
are
removal
(diversity
of
To invoke removal
jurisdiction based on diversity, the notice of removal
must distinctly and affirmatively allege each party's
citizenship.
See McGovern v. American Airlines, Inc.,
511 F. 2d 653, 654 (5th Cir. 1975) (per curiam).
allegations
must
show
that
the
citizenship
of
The
each
plaintiff is different from that of each defendant.
See 28 U.S.C. § 1332; see also 2 James Wm. Moore, et
al., Moore's Federal Practice § 8.03[5][b] at 8-16 (3d
ed. 2006).
The removal notice is insufficient because it does
not
indicate
the
citizenship
of
a
party
that
‘limited
liability
company’:
Integrated
Oncology
Network,
L.L.C.
“[L]ike
is
a
Community
a
limited
partnership, a limited liability company is a citizen
of any state of which a member of the company is a
citizen.”
Rolling
Greens
MHP,
L.P.
v.
Comcast
SCH
Holdings L.L.C., 374 F.3d 1020, 1022 (11th Cir. 2004).
The notice must therefore allege “the citizenships of
all the members of the limited liability company.”
Id.
(And if the entity consists of several entities, the
complaint
must
reflect
the
citizenship,
or
citizenships, of each and every entity based on the
nature of that entity.)
2
***
It is therefore the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of
the court that the removing defendant has until October
21, 2014, to amend the notice of removal to allege
jurisdiction
otherwise
sufficiently,
this
lawsuit
see
shall
28
be
U.S.C.
§
1653;
remanded
to
state
court.
DONE, this the 7th day of October, 2014.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?