Berry v. Reed (INMATE 2)
ORDER 5 Report and Recommendation and 13 supplemental Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge; Mr. Berry's claims for defamation and slander in Amended Complaint are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), and that the Complaint and amendments thereto are DISMISSED prior to service of process. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 4/20/15. (djy, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
CASE NO. 1:14-CV-1110-WKW
On November 6, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation that
Plaintiff Cordaryl Cornelius Berry’s Complaint be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). (Doc. # 5.) Mr. Berry filed a timely Objection (Doc. # 6) to
The Magistrate Judge determined that Mr. Berry’s
Objection contained a motion to amend his Complaint to include additional claims.
In response, the Magistrate Judge directed Mr. Berry to file an amended complaint.
Mr. Berry filed his Amended Complaint on January 22, 2015. (Doc. # 12.)
The Magistrate Judge reviewed Mr. Berry’s Amended Complaint and issued a
Supplemental Recommendation on March 23, 2015, to which no timely objections
have been filed. (Doc. # 13.)
Upon an independent review of the file in this case, it is ORDERED that the
Recommendation (Doc. # 13) are ADOPTED, that Mr. Berry’s claims for
defamation and slander in Amended Complaint are DISMISSED with prejudice
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), and that the Complaint and amendments
thereto are DISMISSED prior to service of process.
An appropriate final judgment will be entered separately.
DONE this 20th day of April, 2015.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?