Hill v. Colvin

Filing 27

ORDERED as follows: 1. That the motion for attorney's fees (doc. # 24 ) be and is hereby GRANTED and the plaintiff be and is hereby AWARDED fees in the amount of $2,552.30. 2. To the extent that plaintiff's counsel requests that fees should be awarded to directly to counsel, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A) authorizes the court to award fees to the prevailing party. See 28 U.S.C. § (d)(2)(B). See also Reeves, supra. The motion that fees be paid directly to counsel be and is hereby DENIED. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 7/8/2016. (kh, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION RANDY HILL, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14cv1141-CSC (WO) MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER Now pending before the court is the plaintiff’s application for attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), filed on June 27, 2016. (Doc. # 24). The defendant does not object to an award of fees in the amount of $2,552.30 representing 13.50 hours of attorney time. See Doc. # 26. On May 5, 2008, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals decided Reeves v. Astrue, 526 F.3d 732 (11th Cir. 2008) in which the Court unambiguously held that “attorney’s fees are awarded to the prevailing party, not to the prevailing party’s attorney.” Id. at 738. On June 14, 2010, the United States Supreme Court decided Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 130 (2010) in which the Court unambiguously held that attorney’s fees are awarded to the prevailing litigant, not to prevailing litigant’s attorney. See also Reeves v. Astrue, 526 F.3d 732, 738 (11th Cir. 2008) (“attorney’s fees are awarded to the prevailing party, not to the prevailing party's attorney.”). Accordingly, upon consideration of the motion, and for good cause, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. That the motion for attorney’s fees (doc. # 24) be and is hereby GRANTED and the plaintiff be and is hereby AWARDED fees in the amount of $2,552.30. 2. To the extent that plaintiff’s counsel requests that fees should be awarded to directly to counsel, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A) authorizes the court to award fees to the prevailing party. See 28 U.S.C. § (d)(2)(B). See also Reeves, supra. The motion that fees be paid directly to counsel be and is hereby DENIED. Done this 8th day of July, 2016. /s/Charles S. Coody CHARLES S. COODY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?