Ingmire v. Bruner et al (INMATE 2)
ORDERED that the 13 Recommendation is ADOPTED, that Defendants' 11 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED to the extent Defendants' seek dismissal of Plaintiff's claims due to Plaintiff's failure to properly exhaust his administrative remedies, and that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). A separate final judgment will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 5/7/2015. (kh, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
CHARLES DAVID INGMIRE,
PEREZ BRUNER, et al.,
CASE NO. 1:14-CV-1223-WKW
On April 13, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this
case to which no timely objections have been filed.
(Doc. # 13.)
independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the
Recommendation, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation is ADOPTED, that
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 11) is GRANTED to the extent
Defendants’ seek dismissal of Plaintiff’s claims due to Plaintiff’s failure to
properly exhaust his administrative remedies, and that this action is DISMISSED
without prejudice pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a).
A separate final judgment will be entered.
DONE this 7th day of May, 2015.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?