Jarrell v. Valenza et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 28

ORDER: It is ORDERED that: 1. The 27 Recommendation is ADOPTED; 2. The defendants motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. 3. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the defendants. 4. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 5. Costs are taxed against the plaintiff. A separate Final Judgment will be entered in accordance with this order. Signed by Honorable Judge Emily C. Marks on 9/17/2018. (dmn, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION GEORGE EDWARD JARRELL, Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF DONALD VALENZA, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:16-CV-188-ECM (WO) ORDER On August 17, 2018, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (doc. # 27) to which no objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Recommendation is ADOPTED; 2. The defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. 3. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the defendants. 4. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 5. Costs are taxed against the plaintiff. A separate Final Judgment will be entered in accordance with this order. Done this the 17th day of September, 2018. /s/Emily C. Marks EMILY C. MARKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?