Lewis v. Houston County Sheriff(INMATE 1)

Filing 35

ORDER as follows: 1. The 34 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2. Defendant's 25 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; 3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1997e(a) for Plaintiff's failure to exhaust an administrative remedy; and 4. No costs are taxed. A final judgment will be entered separately. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 3/17/2017. (dmn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
JESSIE LEWIS, JR.,
Plaintiff,
v.
HOUSTON COUNTY SHERIFF,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 1:16-CV-295-WKW
[WO]

ORDER
Before the court is the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (Doc. # 34.)
There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and based on a review
of the record, it is ORDERED as follows:
1.

The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 34) is

ADOPTED;
2.

Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. # 25) is GRANTED;

3.

This case is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 42 U.S.C.

§ 1997e(a) for Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust an administrative remedy; and
4.

No costs are taxed.

A final judgment will be entered separately.

DONE this 17th day of March, 2017.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2