United States of America v. $441,000.00 in U.S. Currency (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)

Filing 14

DECREE of Forfeiture directing that it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the motion for decree of forfeiture (doc. no. 13 ) is granted and the defendant $441,000.00 in U.S. currency is hereby forfeited to the United States, to be disposed of according to law, as further set out. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on August 30, 2016. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. $441,000.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-cv-373-MHT (WO) DECREE OF FORFEITURE Before the court is the United States of America’s (“United States”) motion for decree of forfeiture (doc. no. 13). On May 24, 2016, the United States filed a verified complaint for forfeiture (doc. no. 1) alleging that the defendant property is subject to forfeiture pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(A), (C) and (D) (iv) and (v), for violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 (mail fraud), 1343 (wire fraud), 1344 (bank fraud), 1956 and 1957(a) (money laundering), and 1960 (unlicensed money transmitting business). Pursuant to a warrant for arrest in rem issued by this court on May 25, 2016 (doc. no. 3), the District Asset Forfeiture Coordinator with the United States Marshals Service served defendant on June 10, 2016. See Process Receipt and Return (doc. no. 5). On July 5, 2016, attorney A. Jeff Ifrah, on behalf of Husam Tayeh and Dinar Corp., Inc was served with copies of the verified complaint for forfeiture, notice of complaint, and warrant of arrest in rem. See Acknowledgment of Service (doc. nos. 7, 10, 10-1). On July 5, 2016, attorney A. Jeff Ifrah, on behalf of Husam Tayeh, was served with copies of the verified complaint for forfeiture, notice of complaint, and warrant of arrest in rem. See Acknowledgment of Service (doc. nos. 8, 9, 9-1). Notice of said civil forfeiture action was posted on an official government internet site (www.forfeiture.gov) for a period of 30 consecutive days. See Declaration of Publication (doc. no. 6). On June 7, 2016, an information was filed in the Middle District of Alabama charging Husam Usama Tayeh a/k/a “Sam Tayeh,” “Sam,” and “Hasam Usama Tayeh” with wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343. (USA v. Tayeh, 1:16cr213-WKW). On July 11, 2016, Husam Usama Tayeh entered a plea of guilty to wire fraud. The plea agreement (USA v. Tayeh, 1:16cr213-WKW, doc. no. 11) contained the following language: The defendant agrees to waive any and all rights – constitutional, statutory, or otherwise – that he may have with regard to the civil forfeiture proceedings related to the following cases: (1) United States v. 2004 Porsche Cayenne, VIN: WP1AC29P94LA93238, with all appurtenances and attachments thereon, et al., 1:15-CV-936-WKW; (2) United States v. $20,000 seized from Pentagon Federal Credit Union Account Number xxxxx4-025 in the name of Theodore S. Hudson and/or Adeline C. Hudson, et al., 1:16-CV-205-WKW; and (3) United States v. $441,000.00 in U.S. Currency, 1:16-CV-373-MHT. More specifically, the defendant agrees that he hereby forfeits all rights that he had to any of the defendant property in those cases and that he hereby waives any and all right to contest the forfeiture of the defendant property. On August 24, 2016, the clerk of court entered default against Husam Tayeh, individually and on behalf of Dinar Corp., Inc., and against Dinar Corp., Inc. See Clerk’s Entry of Default (doc. no. 12). 2 It appearing that process was fully issued in this action and returned according to law and for good cause otherwise shown, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the motion for decree of forfeiture (doc. no. 13) is granted and the defendant $441,000.00 in U.S. currency is hereby forfeited to the United States, to be disposed of according to law. DONE, this the 30th day of August, 2016. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?