Tharp v. Reed et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 29

ORDER directing as follows: (1) the 27 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; (2) defs' 23 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; (3) this case is DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance wit the provisions of 42 U.S.C 1997e(a) for Pl's failure to exhaust an administrative remedy before seeking relief from the court; and (4) no costs are taxed. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 11/14/16. (djy, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
EVESTER THARP, JR., #207773,
Plaintiff,
v.
KEITH REED, JAMES
BRAZIER, and KIM TURNER,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 1:16-CV-374-WKW
[WO]

ORDER
Before the court is the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (Doc. # 27.)
There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and based on a review
of the record, it is ORDERED as follows:
1.

The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 27) is

ADOPTED;
2.

Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. # 23) is GRANTED;

3.

This case is DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the

provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) for Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust an administrative
remedy before seeking relief from the court; and
4.

No costs are taxed.

A final judgment will be entered separately.

DONE this 14th day of November, 2016.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2