Steib v. Reed et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 26

ORDER: It is ORDERED as follows: (1) The Recommendation (Doc. 24 ) is ADOPTED.(2) This action is DISMISSED with prejudice under 42 U.S.C. 1997e(a) for Plaintiffs failure to exhaust properly an administrative remedy prior to seeking relief from this court. (3) No costs are taxed. A final judgment will be entered separately. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 1/13/2017. (dmn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
MELVIN STEIB, # 195252,
Plaintiff,
v.
KEITH REED, KIM TURNER,
OFFICER LANDREAU, AND
OFFICER TRAWICK,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 1:16-CV-563-WKW
[WO]

ORDER
On December 13, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation to
which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 24.) Upon an independent
review of the record as a whole, it is ORDERED as follows:
(1)

The Recommendation (Doc. # 24) is ADOPTED.

(2)

This action is DISMISSED with prejudice under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a)

for Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust properly an administrative remedy prior to seeking
relief from this court.
(3)

No costs are taxed.

A final judgment will be entered separately.
DONE this 13th day of January, 2017.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE