Bryant v. City of Dothan, Alabama et al

Filing 28

OPINION and ORDER (1) ADOPTING 27 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge; (2) defs' granting 24 Motion for More Definite Statement is granted, and that defs' 24 Motion to Dismiss is denied as moot; (3) plf shall refile his proposed second amended complaint by 7/7/2017; further ORDERING that this case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 6/28/17. (djy, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION JETAVIAN BRYANT, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. CITY OF DOTHAN, ALABAMA, a municipal corporation; et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16cv913-MHT (WO) OPINION AND ORDER Pursuant to plaintiff filed subjected to 42 officers. U.S.C. this case excessive This case § is 1983 and claiming force by before state that law the law, he was enforcement court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that defendants’ motion for a more definite statement be granted; denied as that moot; defendants’ and that motion plaintiff to be dismiss be directed to refile his proposed second amendment complaint. are no objections to the recommendation. There Upon an independent and de novo review of the record, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 27) is adopted. (2) Defendants’ statement (doc. motion no. 24) for is a more granted, definite and that defendants’ motion to dismiss (doc. no. 24) is denied as moot. (3) Plaintiff shall refile his proposed second amended complaint by July 7, 2017. It is further ORDERED that this case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. DONE, this the 28th day of June, 2017. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?