Bryant v. City of Dothan, Alabama et al
Filing
28
OPINION and ORDER (1) ADOPTING 27 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge; (2) defs' granting 24 Motion for More Definite Statement is granted, and that defs' 24 Motion to Dismiss is denied as moot; (3) plf shall refile his proposed second amended complaint by 7/7/2017; further ORDERING that this case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 6/28/17. (djy, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION
JETAVIAN BRYANT,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF DOTHAN, ALABAMA,
a municipal corporation;
et al.,
Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION NO.
1:16cv913-MHT
(WO)
OPINION AND ORDER
Pursuant
to
plaintiff
filed
subjected
to
42
officers.
U.S.C.
this
case
excessive
This
case
§
is
1983
and
claiming
force
by
before
state
that
law
the
law,
he
was
enforcement
court
on
the
recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge
that defendants’ motion for a more definite statement
be
granted;
denied
as
that
moot;
defendants’
and
that
motion
plaintiff
to
be
dismiss
be
directed
to
refile his proposed second amendment complaint.
are
no
objections
to
the
recommendation.
There
Upon
an
independent and de novo review of the record, it is
ORDERED as follows:
(1) The
recommendation
of
the
United
States
Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 27) is adopted.
(2) Defendants’
statement
(doc.
motion
no.
24)
for
is
a
more
granted,
definite
and
that
defendants’ motion to dismiss (doc. no. 24) is denied
as moot.
(3) Plaintiff
shall
refile
his
proposed
second
amended complaint by July 7, 2017.
It is further ORDERED that this case is referred
back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings.
DONE, this the 28th day of June, 2017.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?