Bradley v. City of Dothan et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG2)
ORDER: The Court APPROVES AND ADOPTS the 88 Report and Recommendation as the judgment of the Court; The action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; The Clerk of Court is hereby ORDERED to close this case. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark Howard Cohen on 10/9/2018. (Furnished: Calendar & WR) (Terminated: PTC for 1/16/2019 & Jury Trial for 3/11/2019) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(alm, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
CIVIL ACTION FILE
PHILLIP SMALL,Deputy Officer,
individually and in his official
Officer, individually and in his
official capacity, MIKE STACEY,
Deputy Officer, individually and in
his official capacity,
This action comes before this Court on the Final Report and
Recommendation("R&R")of Magistrate Judge David A. Baker [Doc. 88] finding
that the parties filed a joint stipulation of dismissal with prejudice [Doc. 87] and
recommending that the Court enter an order directing the Clerk of the Court to
close this case. The R&R provided notice that, in accordance with 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1), the parties were authorized to file objections within fourteen(14) days
ofthe receipt ofthat Order. Within the time period for filing objections, no party
filed objections to the R&R.
Absent objection, the district courtjudge "may accept, reject, or modify, in
whole or n part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge."
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Based upon the absence of objections to the R&R,in
accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court has reviewed the R&R for plain
error. See United States v. Slay, 714 F.2d 1093, 1095 (11th Cir. 1983). The Court
finds no plain error and that the R&R is supported by law.
The Court APPROVES AND ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation
[Doc. 88] as the judgment ofthe Court. The action is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is hereby ORDERED to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED this
day of October, 2018.
MARK H. COHEN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?