Fulgham v. Steensland et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 7

ORDERED as follows: 1. The Recommendation (Doc. # 4 ) is ADOPTED. 2. Plaintiff's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 is DISMISSED with prejudice. 3. Plaintiff's state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(c)(3). Final judgment will be entered separately. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 7/5/2017. (kh, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
CODY LEE FULGHAM,
# 65914 A-5,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOHN STEENSLAND, III, and
PARKMAN WHITE, LLP,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 1:17-CV-238-WKW
[WO]

ORDER
On May 1, 2017, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation to which no
timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 4.) Upon an independent review of the
record and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED as
follows:
1.

The Recommendation (Doc. # 4) is ADOPTED.

2.

Plaintiff’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §

1983 is DISMISSED with prejudice.
3.

Plaintiff’s state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to

28 U.S.C. 1367(c)(3).

Final judgment will be entered separately.
DONE this 5th day of July, 2017.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE