Fulgham v. Steensland et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 8

FINAL JUDGMENT: In accordance with the prior proceedings, opinions, and orders of the court, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows: 1. Judgment is ENTERED on Plaintiff's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel pursuant to 42 U.S. C. § 1983 in favor of Defendants John Steensland, III, and Parkman White, LLP, and against Plaintiff Cody Lee Fulgham. 2. Plaintiff Cody Lee Fulgham's state law claims against Defendants John Steensland and Parkman White, LLP, are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(c)(3).The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 7/5/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(kh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION CODY LEE FULGHAM, # 65914 A-5, Plaintiff, v. JOHN STEENSLAND, III, and PARKMAN WHITE, LLP, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:17-CV-238-WKW [WO] FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the prior proceedings, opinions, and orders of the court, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows: 1. Judgment is ENTERED on Plaintiff’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in favor of Defendants John Steensland, III, and Parkman White, LLP, and against Plaintiff Cody Lee Fulgham. 2. Plaintiff Cody Lee Fulgham’s state law claims against Defendants John Steensland and Parkman White, LLP, are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(c)(3). The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE this 5th day of July, 2017. /s/ W. Keith Watkins CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?