Parker v. Ozark Police Department et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 10

ORDER that: 1. The 5 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2. Plaintiff's claims against the Ozark Police Department are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); and 3. The Ozark Police Department is DISMI SSED as a Defendant in this action. With respect to Plaintiffs claims against the remaining Defendants, this case is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings and determination or Recommendation as may be appropriate. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 6/8/2017. (dmn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION KEMA LATRICE PARKER, AIS #307399 Plaintiff, v. OZARK POLICE DEPT., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:17-CV-310-WKW [WO] ORDER On May 16, 2017, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 5.) Upon an independent review of the record and consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 5) is ADOPTED; 2. Plaintiff’s claims against the Ozark Police Department are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); and 3. The Ozark Police Department is DISMISSED as a Defendant in this action. With respect to Plaintiff’s claims against the remaining Defendants, this case is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings and determination or recommendation as may be appropriate. DONE this 8th day of June, 2017. /s/ W. Keith Watkins CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?