Pearson v. Sun Loan Company Alabama, Inc. et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)

Filing 9

ORDER: Before the court is the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (Doc. 7 .) There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and based on an independent review of the record, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Recommendation of t he Magistrate Judge (Doc. 7 ) is ADOPTED; and 2. Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED prior to service of process pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). A final judgment will be entered separately. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 12/5/2017. (dmn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION LORENZO PEARSON, Plaintiff, v. SUN LOAN COMPANY ALABAMA, INC., BRUNDAGE MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC., THOMAS BRUNDAGE, SUN LOAN COMPANY, INC., and HUGH DOHERTY, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:17-CV-523-WKW [WO] ORDER Before the court is the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (Doc. # 7.) There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and based on an independent review of the record, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 7) is ADOPTED; and 2. Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED prior to service of process pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). A final judgment will be entered separately. DONE this 5th day of December, 2017. /s/ W. Keith Watkins CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?