Pearson v. Sun Loan Company Alabama, Inc. et al (JOINT ASSIGN)

Filing 9

ORDER: Before the court is the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (Doc. 7 .) There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and based on an independent review of the record, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Recommendation of t he Magistrate Judge (Doc. 7 ) is ADOPTED; and 2. Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED prior to service of process pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). A final judgment will be entered separately. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 12/5/2017. (dmn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
LORENZO PEARSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
SUN LOAN COMPANY
ALABAMA, INC., BRUNDAGE
MANAGEMENT COMPANY,
INC., THOMAS BRUNDAGE,
SUN LOAN COMPANY, INC.,
and HUGH DOHERTY,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 1:17-CV-523-WKW
[WO]

ORDER
Before the court is the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (Doc. # 7.)
There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and based on an
independent review of the record, it is ORDERED as follows:
1.

The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 7) is

ADOPTED; and
2.

Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED prior to service of

process pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).
A final judgment will be entered separately.
DONE this 5th day of December, 2017.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE