Tipton v. Houston County Board of Education et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG2)

Filing 39

ORDER: On 12/5/2017, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. 36 .) Upon an independent review of the record and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The R ecommendation (Doc. 36 ) is ADOPTED; (2) Defendant David Sewells motion to dismiss the amended complaint (Doc. 30 ) is GRANTED; (3) Plaintiffs action against Defendant David Sewell is DISMISSED without prejudice; (4) Defendant David Sewells motion to dismiss the originating complaint (Doc. 22 ) is DENIED as moot. This action is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings as to the other Defendants. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 4/5/2018. (dmn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
SHANNON TIPTON,
Plaintiff,
v.
HOUSTON COUNTY BOARD
OF EDUCATION, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 1:17-CV-588-WKW
[WO]

ORDER
On December 5, 2017, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation to which
no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 36.) Upon an independent review of
the record and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED as
follows:
(1)

The Recommendation (Doc. # 36) is ADOPTED;

(2)

Defendant David Sewell’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint

(Doc. # 30) is GRANTED;
(3)

Plaintiff’s action against Defendant David Sewell is DISMISSED

without prejudice;
(4)

Defendant David Sewell’s motion to dismiss the originating complaint

(Doc. # 22) is DENIED as moot.

This action is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings as
to the other Defendants.
DONE this 5th day of April, 2018.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2