Wilson v. Gordon et al (JOINT ASSIGN) (MAG+)
Filing
11
ORDER: It is ORDERED: 1) The Magistrate Judge's 9 Recommendation is ADOPTED; 2) Plf's 10 objections are OVERRULED; 3) This case is DISMISSED without prejudice prior to service of process under 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B); A separate final judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins on 5/28/2019. (alm, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
TERNECIA D. WILSON,
)
)
)
)
) CASE NO. 1:18-CV-387-WKW
)
[WO]
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
ROSE GORDON,
ADRIAN FOLMER,
OFFICER RUIZ,
STEVE PARISH,
MICHAEL WOODSIDE,
Defendants.
ORDER
On April 25, 2019, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation that this
case
be
dismissed
prior
to
service
of
process
under
28
U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). (Doc. # 9.) Plaintiff untimely objected to the Recommendation.
(Doc. # 10.) After an independent and de novo review of the record and the portions
of the Recommendation to which objection was made, the court finds that the
Recommendation is due to be adopted, and this case dismissed without prejudice.
It is ORDERED:
(1)
The Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation (Doc. # 9) is ADOPTED.
(2)
Plaintiff’s objections (Doc. # 10) are OVERRULED.
(3)
This case is DISMISSED without prejudice prior to service of process
under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).
A separate final judgment will be entered.
DONE this 28th day of May, 2019.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?