Mills v. Berryhill

Filing 24

OPINION AND ORDER it is ORDERED as follows that: 1)the Plaintiff's 23 Objections are OVERRULED; 2) the 22 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 3) the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED; and 4) this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 7/30/2019. (am, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
DAVID LAMAR MILLS,
Plaintiff,
v.
ANDREW SAUL,
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIV. ACT. NO. 1:18-cv-584-ECM

OPINION and ORDER
On July 11, 2019, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation recommending
that the decision of the Commissioner be affirmed. (Doc. 22). On July 25, 2019, the
Plaintiff filed objections to the Recommendation. (Doc. 23).
The Court has carefully reviewed the Plaintiff’s Objections, the Recommendation
of the Magistrate Judge, and the administrative record. The Plaintiff’s Objections largely
mirror his brief, and reiterate his claims presented in his complaint. The Plaintiff does not
point to any error committed by the Magistrate Judge. The Court finds that the wellreasoned Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge effectively addresses all of the
Plaintiff’s claims. Accordingly, upon an independent review of the file in this case and for
good cause, it is
ORDERED as follows that:
1. the Plaintiff’s objections are OVERRULED;
2. the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED;
3. the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED; and

4. this case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
DONE this 30th day of July, 2019.
/s/ Emily C. Marks
EMILY C. MARKS
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE