Gilbert v. Headley et al (INMATE 3)

Filing 51

ORDER: it is ORDERED that (1) The 40 Recommendation is ADOPTED; (2) The 25 Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and Motion to Show Cause are DENIED; (3) This case is referred to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge R. Austin Huffaker, Jr on 1/18/2023. (am, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION EMANGER LANDALE GILBERT, AIS 316512, Petitioner, v. JOSEPH H. HEADLEY, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:22-CV-9-RAH ORDER On July 14, 2022, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. 40.) Upon an independent review of the record and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that (1) The Recommendation (Doc. 40) is ADOPTED; (2) The Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and Motion to Show Cause (Doc. 25) are DENIED; (3) This case is referred to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. DONE on this the 18th day of January, 2023. /s/ R. Austin Huffaker, Jr. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?