Reynolds v. Dept/Transportation, et al
Filing
8748
JUDGMENT, in accordance with the 8747 memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) the plf's 8721 Objections are overruled; (2) the special master's 8719 REPORT AND RECOMMENDA TION is adopted; (3) the defendants' 8477 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted on the individual-contempt claims of claimant Jeffrey Hollingsworth; (4) judgment is entered in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiffs as to claimant Hollingsworth's individual-contempt claims, with the plaintiffs and claimant Hollingsworth's claims; directing the clerk to enter the document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 12/5/11. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
JOHNNY REYNOLDS, et al.,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
v.
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION, et al.,
Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:85cv665-MHT
(WO)
JUDGMENT
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court as follows:
(1) The plaintiffs’ objections (Doc. No. 8721) are
overruled.
(2) The special master’s recommendation (Doc. No.
8719) is adopted.
(3) The
defendants’
motion
for
summary
judgment
(Doc. No. 8477) is granted on the individualcontempt
claims
Hollingsworth.
of
claimant
Jeffrey
(4) Judgment is entered in favor of the defendants
and
against
the
plaintiffs
as
to
claimant
Hollingsworth’s individual-contempt claims, with
the plaintiffs and claimant Hollingsworth taking
nothing as to claimant Hollingsworth’s claims.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant
to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
DONE, this the 5th day of December, 2011.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?