Reynolds v. Dept/Transportation, et al
Filing
8981
JUDGMENT, in accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) claimant Jerry Pogue's 8939 Objections are overruled; (2) the special master's 8924 REPORT AND RE COMMENDATION regarding claimant Pogue's individual-contempt claim against defendants is ADOPTED; (3) the defendants' 8353 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted; (4) judgment is entered in favor of defendants and against claimant Pogue, with claimant Pogue taking nothing by his individual-contempt claim; directing the Clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 8/9/13. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )
Reynolds v. Dept/Transportation, et al
Doc. 8981
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
JOHNNY REYNOLDS, et al.,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
v.
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION, et al.,
Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:85cv665-MHT
(WO)
JUDGMENT
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court as follows:
(1) Claimant
Jerry
Poque’s
objections
(Doc.
No.
8939) are overruled.
(2) The special master’s recommendation regarding
claimant
Poque’s
individual-contempt
claim
against defendants (Doc. No. 8924) is adopted.
(3) The
defendants’
motion
for
summary
judgment
(Doc. No. 8353) is granted.
Dockets.Justia.com
(4) Judgment is entered in favor of defendants and
against
claimant
Pogue,
with
claimant
Pogue
taking nothing by his individual-contempt claim.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant
to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
DONE, this the 9th day of August, 2013.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?