Crum, et al v. State of Alabama, et al

Filing 944

ORDER: It having come to the courts attention that plaintiff Carolyn Ball was not served with the submission order on the motion to dismiss her case forfailure to prosecute, it is ORDERED that the submission order (doc. no. 935 ) is vacated. It is f urther ORDERED that plaintiff Carolyn Ball must SHOW CAUSE, if any there be, in writing by 3/25/2016, as to why the motion to dismiss her case (doc. no. 932 ) should not be granted. If plaintiff Ball does not respond by that date, her case will be dismissed. Show Cause Response due by 3/25/2016. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 3/11/2016. Copy mailed regular mail and CMRRR to Carolyn A. Ball.(dmn, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION IN RE: EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION LITIGATION AGAINST THE STATE OF ALABAMA, et al., EUGENE CRUM, JR., et al., Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF ALABAMA, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:94cv356-MHT (WO) ORDER It having plaintiff come Carolyn to Ball the court’s was not attention served with that the submission order on the motion to dismiss her case for failure to prosecute, it is ORDERED that the submission order (doc. no. 935) is vacated. It is further ORDERED that plaintiff Carolyn Ball must show cause, if any there be, in writing by March 25, 2016, as to why the motion to dismiss her case (doc. no. 932) should not be granted. If plaintiff Ball does not respond by that date, her case will be dismissed. DONE, this the 11th day of March, 2016. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?